Shahid Beheshti University Sustainable Development of Geographical Environment 2476-5805 Articles in Press 2024 08 23 Evaluation and measurement of sustainable regeneration components in the central part of the city (Study case: District 12 of Tehran) Evaluation and measurement of sustainable regeneration components in the central part of the city (Study case: District 12 of Tehran) 104749 10.48308/sdge.2024.235923.1195 FA Bayazid Sharifi Shahid Beheshti University Lofali Kozegarkaleji,, Faculty of Earth Sciences Shahid Beheshti University Mohammad Taghi Razavian Faculty of Earth Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran Journal Article 2024 06 04 The main purpose of this research is to investigate the status of sustainable urban regeneration indicators in the 12th district of Tehran from the perspective of three groups (officials, citizens, urban elites). The research method used is descriptive-analytical. In this regard, 383 questionnaires among citizens, 50 questionnaires among urban elites and 50 questionnaires among officials and experts of related departments and organizations have been completed. SPSS software and MANOVA multivariate analysis of variance test were used for data analysis. The results show; The overall average of urban regeneration indicators in the 12th district of Tehran is equal to 2.82 from the point of view of the officials and 2.49 from the citizens' point of view and 2.55 from the urban elites' point of view. According to all three groups, the average of all indicators was lower than the theoretical average of the questionnaires, which is (3). In general, the average opinions of the two groups of urban elites and citizens are very close to the status of sustainable urban regeneration indicators in the 12th district of Tehran, and they have described the city's situation as inappropriate in terms of indicators. However, the average opinions of managers are different compared to the other two groups, and from the managers' point of view, the indicators are very close to the average. The results of the MANOA test also show that there is a significant difference between the opinions of different urban groups in terms of sustainable urban regeneration indicators. And it is only in the economic index that there is no difference between the average opinions of the groups, while in other indices there is a significant difference between the opinions of the groups regarding the indices.<br /> The main purpose of this research is to investigate the status of sustainable urban regeneration indicators in the 12th district of Tehran from the perspective of three groups (officials, citizens, urban elites). The research method used is descriptive-analytical. In this regard, 383 questionnaires among citizens, 50 questionnaires among urban elites and 50 questionnaires among officials and experts of related departments and organizations have been completed. SPSS software and MANOVA multivariate analysis of variance test were used for data analysis. The results show; The overall average of urban regeneration indicators in the 12th district of Tehran is equal to 2.82 from the point of view of the officials and 2.49 from the citizens' point of view and 2.55 from the urban elites' point of view. According to all three groups, the average of all indicators was lower than the theoretical average of the questionnaires, which is (3). In general, the average opinions of the two groups of urban elites and citizens are very close to the status of sustainable urban regeneration indicators in the 12th district of Tehran, and they have described the city's situation as inappropriate in terms of indicators. However, the average opinions of managers are different compared to the other two groups, and from the managers' point of view, the indicators are very close to the average. The results of the MANOA test also show that there is a significant difference between the opinions of different urban groups in terms of sustainable urban regeneration indicators. And it is only in the economic index that there is no difference between the average opinions of the groups, while in other indices there is a significant difference between the opinions of the groups regarding the indices.<br /> The results of the MANOA test also show that there is a significant difference between the opinions of different urban groups in terms of sustainable urban regeneration indicators.The results of the MANOA test also show that there is a significant difference between the opinions of different urban groups in terms of sustainable urban regeneration indicators. The main purpose of this research is to investigate the status of sustainable urban regeneration indicators in the 12th district of Tehran from the perspective of three groups (officials, citizens, urban elites). The research method used is descriptive-analytical. In this regard, 383 questionnaires among citizens, 50 questionnaires among urban elites and 50 questionnaires among officials and experts of related departments and organizations have been completed. SPSS software and MANOVA multivariate analysis of variance test were used for data analysis. The results show; The overall average of urban regeneration indicators in the 12th district of Tehran is equal to 2.82 from the point of view of the officials and 2.49 from the citizens' point of view and 2.55 from the urban elites' point of view. According to all three groups, the average of all indicators was lower than the theoretical average of the questionnaires, which is (3). In general, the average opinions of the two groups of urban elites and citizens are very close to the status of sustainable urban regeneration indicators in the 12th district of Tehran, and they have described the city's situation as inappropriate in terms of indicators. However, the average opinions of managers are different compared to the other two groups, and from the managers' point of view, the indicators are very close to the average. The results of the MANOA test also show that there is a significant difference between the opinions of different urban groups in terms of sustainable urban regeneration indicators. And it is only in the economic index that there is no difference between the average opinions of the groups, while in other indices there is a significant difference between the opinions of the groups regarding the indices.<br /> The main purpose of this research is to investigate the status of sustainable urban regeneration indicators in the 12th district of Tehran from the perspective of three groups (officials, citizens, urban elites). The research method used is descriptive-analytical. In this regard, 383 questionnaires among citizens, 50 questionnaires among urban elites and 50 questionnaires among officials and experts of related departments and organizations have been completed. SPSS software and MANOVA multivariate analysis of variance test were used for data analysis. The results show; The overall average of urban regeneration indicators in the 12th district of Tehran is equal to 2.82 from the point of view of the officials and 2.49 from the citizens' point of view and 2.55 from the urban elites' point of view. According to all three groups, the average of all indicators was lower than the theoretical average of the questionnaires, which is (3). In general, the average opinions of the two groups of urban elites and citizens are very close to the status of sustainable urban regeneration indicators in the 12th district of Tehran, and they have described the city's situation as inappropriate in terms of indicators. However, the average opinions of managers are different compared to the other two groups, and from the managers' point of view, the indicators are very close to the average. The results of the MANOA test also show that there is a significant difference between the opinions of different urban groups in terms of sustainable urban regeneration indicators. And it is only in the economic index that there is no difference between the average opinions of the groups, while in other indices there is a significant difference between the opinions of the groups regarding the indices.<br /> The results of the MANOA test also show that there is a significant difference between the opinions of different urban groups in terms of sustainable urban regeneration indicators.The results of the MANOA test also show that there is a significant difference between the opinions of different urban groups in terms of sustainable urban regeneration indicators.