Sustainable Development of Geographical Environment

Sustainable Development of Geographical Environment

How to Divide Local Competences from National Competences in Decentralized Systems (France and Turkey)

Document Type : Original article

Author
Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Faculty of Earth Science, Shahid Beheshti University,Tehran, Iran
10.48308/sdge.2026.241959.1277
Abstract
Introduction: Decentralization is a new type of organization that results in the formation of various structures for the management at multiple national and local scales. An important perspective of power distribution or decentralization in decentralized systems is to provide the basis for improving management and providing local services by transferring the competences and authorities of land administration from the central government to local governments. For this purpose, and in the process of decentralization, local competences are separated from national competences in these systems. To gain experience on how to separate local from national competences, this article examines the countries of France and Turkey as decentralized systems.
Materials and Methods: The method of the article is descriptive and its approach is deductive, in which the selected countries have been subjected to a comparative study based on the theoretical framework of decentralization. The data collection tool is library and computer, and the study of legal texts and scientific and research documents. In the research methodology, first, considering the most important indicators determining the decentralization model and in order to determine the legal principles of how to separate local competences from national competences in the selected countries, the laws and documents in question have been examined using the method of directional qualitative content analysis. The study framework includes examining the foundations of the formation of local governments and the type of their relationship with the central government, describing the competences of local governments, and also providing an example of how to separate local competences from national competences in the field of health in the countries under study.
Results and Discussion: The results show that understanding the legal status and the type of financial and supervisory relationship between local and central government in such political systems is an introduction to addressing the issue of how to separate local and national competences. In countries with decentralized system, local governments have a legal status in the administration of the country's affairs, the guiding principles of which are derived from the constitution. Despite their extensive competences, local governments in these countries do not have complete independence in decision-making, administration, and implementation of local affairs, and a specific supervisory and financial relationship exists between local and central governments. Influenced by these factors, the position of local governments in the administrative and decision-making structure has been determined, and the scope of its competences and powers has been determined. The experiences of the countries studied show that the system of national divisions and their various levels, rather than simply defining various population and settlement points, focuses more on defining and introducing local units and actors in the administration of the country that have a legal status in the country.
Conclusion: Therefore, the formulation of guiding principles for decentralization is inevitable, in which the type of supervisory and financial relationship between local government and the national government must be determined. Also, in separating local competences from national competences, it is not possible to determine a fixed boundary between the scope of competences and performance of the central government and local governments, but it is possible to consider some of the affairs that are sufficiently homogeneous and have similar characteristics as local affairs within the scope of competences of the central government. It is worth noting that the separation is not done with a specific and specific criterion, but local competences in each of the different areas are separated from national competences among different local units such as secretary of state, governorates and municipalities at the discretion of the boards or legal councils consisting of experts in the same domain.
Keywords
Subjects

Aghayitoogh, M., 2007. Administrative decentralization in Iran: A critical look at councils in Iran. Journal of Parliament and Strategy, 56, 125–144. https://doi.org/10.22054/qjpl.2024.79090.2986 (In Persian)
Braun, V., & Clarke, V., 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Code général des collectivités territoriales. Available at: https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/texte_lc/LEGITEXT000006070633/2022-08-01
Council of Europe Publishing. Structure and operation of local and regional democracy. Available at: https://rm.coe.int/1680748119
Directorate-General for Local Authorities, Ministry of the Interior and Overseas Territories. Available at: http://www.interieur.gouv.fr
Doug, D., & Liang, W., 2011. Management and staffing at a start-up regional airlines company. Journal of Human Resources Management in China, 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-84334-552-7.50005-5
European Committee of the Regions, n.d. State, member, division of power: France. Available at: https://portal.cor.europa.eu/divisionpowers/Pages/France-Introduction.aspx
Hafeznia, M., Roumina, E., Ahmadypour, Z., & Fani, A., 2013. Political management of space in unitary state systems. Geopolitical Quarterly, 9(29), 1–31. 20.1001.1.17354331.1392.9.29.1.2 (In Persian)
İl İdaresi Kanunu. Available at: http://mevzuat.shgm.gov.tr/imevzuat/kanun/5442.pdf
İl Özel İdaresi Kanunu. Available at: https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/mevzuatmetin/1.5.5302.pdf
Jalali, M., 2015. The guiding principles of decentralization in French law and its comparison with Iranian law. Journal of Public Law Research, 17(47), 71–100. (In Persian)
Kanunu of Köy, 1924. Law No. 442. Available at: https://www.hukuki.net/kanun/442.13.text.php
Kartal, N., 2015. Local governments and government of cities in Turkey. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 5(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.5296/jpag.v5i1.6858
Khalaj Monfared, A., 2017. Authoritarianism of Erdogan and Justice and Development Party (AK Party) in Turkey and its consequences. Journal of Contemporary Political Studies, 7(22), 67–91. (In Persian)
Le Lidec, P., 2007. The game of compromise: The state and local authorities in decentralization in France. French Review of Public Administration, 111–130.
Mazhari, M., 2016. A reflection on the election process of city and village councils in Iran and France. Journal of Comparative Law Review, 7(2), 725–752. https://doi.org/10.22059/jcl.2016.60700 (In Persian)
Mercier, J., 2014. The principle of indivisibility of the Republic by Félicien Lemaire. Humanisme, 302, 78–79.
Metropolitan Municipality Law. Available at: http://www.lawsturkey.com/law/law-on-metropolitan-municipalities-5216
Mirahmadi, F., 2018. Feasibility of dividing the vast provinces of the country (Sistan and Baluchistan, Kerman and Fars). Parliament Research Center. Limited access. (In Persian)
Mirheidar, D., & Zaki, G. H., 2002. Investigating regional political-geographical system and its feasibility in Iran. Geographical Research, 42, 49–64. (In Persian)
Moosazadeh, E., & Khosravi, H., 2025. Administrative rights. Tehran: Mizan Publications. 336 p.
Municipal Law, Law No. 5393. Available at: http://www.lawsturkey.com/law/municipality-law-5393
Provincial and local government. Available at: https://countrystudies.us/turkey/75.htm
Qalibaf, M. B., Ahmadi, A., Zaki, Y., Lashgari Tafreshi, E., & Razavinezhad, M., 2020. Pathology of political management of space in centralized simple systems: Case study of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Research Political Geography, 4(2), 83–120. https://doi.org/10.22067/pg.v4i2.85293 (In Persian)
Rohdewohld, R., 2023. Decentralization, local governance, and localizing the sustainable development goals in Asia and the Pacific. In Political and Administrative Decentralization in Asia and the Pacific. Routledge Studies in Sustainable Development. 406 p.
Romina, E., & Seifodini, H., 2021. The explanation of the relation between local and national authorities in unitary states: The case study of Turkey. Journal of National Studies, 22(85), 159–180. https://doi.org/10.22034/rjnsq.2021.128222 (In Persian)
Safar, M., & Shirzadi, R., 2014. Natural institutional local governance. Parliament Research Center. https://report.mrc.ir/article_5491_df4f499df2112a3595b9582631805af4.pdf (In Persian)
Saito, F., 2008. Foundations for local governance: Decentralization in comparative perspective. Physica/Springer. 311 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2006-5
Savaşkan, O., 2020. Political dynamics of local government reform in a development context: The case of Turkey. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 39, 204–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654420943903
Spatial administration. Available at: https://www.icisleri.gov.tr/illeridaresi/ozel-idare1
Swift, N., & G. K., 2003. A complex system aims to bring French local government closer to the people. Available at: http://citymayors.com/france/france_gov.html
Tan, E., 2020. Quo vadis? The local government in Turkey after public management reforms. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 86, 115–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852317752268
Vaezi, M., & Fadayi, S., 2020. A comparative study of decentralization patterns in France, England and America with a brief look at Iran. Journal of Fundamental Rights, 14(28), 127–147. (In Persian)

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 26 July 2026