Authors
1
Ph.D. Student in Social Issues of Iran, Department of Social Sciences, Faculty of Humanities & Social Sciences, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran
2
Associate Professor, Department of Social Sciences, Faculty of Humanities & Social Sciences, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran
,
Document Type : Original article
Abstract
With spreading environmental problems, natural ecosystems in rural areas are also exposed to destruction. These challenges are mainly due to the behavior of individuals in interaction with nature. The purpose of this study is to investigate and identify the context of occurrence and formation of environmental problems in rural areas of Guilan province. This research is based on a qualitative approach and based on grounded theory. The geographical area of the research was the villages of the west of Gilan province and its statistical population was composed of villagers of those areas in 1399(2019). In-depth interviews were conducted with 25 villagers and environmental experts using theoretical saturation sampling. The validity and reliability of this study were evaluated based on control on validation by the participants. Data analysis was performed in three stages of coding. 7 concepts were identified as the most important environmental issues. in selective coding, the core, i.e., "environmental degradation and ecosystem instability" was discovered and the final paradigm model was drawn accordingly. Causal conditions included communal use, non-separation of national and personal boundaries, land use change, landfill, misuse, wasteful grazing, profit-seeking and livelihood exploitation. The intervening conditions included nationality of natural resources, weak supervision and unprincipled exploitation. Overall, findings showed that environmental degradation is a multi factorial phenomenon that the continuity of convergence between the set of causal and intervening conditions in the context of structural factors and behaviors of villagers have caused its occurrence. Based on this, it can be suggested that in order to reduce degradation and pollution and preserve the environment, structural reforms in the areas of infrastructure, support and education are necessary to improve environmental protection behaviors.
- Alam, S., Fatima, A. and Butt, M.S., 2007. Sustainable Development in Pakistan in the Context of Energy Consumption Demand and Environmental Degradation Journal of Asian Economics: 18(5), p. 825-837.
https://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeeasieco/
- Berenguer, J., Corraliza, J.A. and Martín, R., 2005. Rural-Urban Differences in Environmental Concern, Attitudes, and Actions. European Journal of. Psychological Assessment: 21(2), p. 128-138.
https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2005-02751-006
- Bossel, H., 1999. Indicators for Sustainable Development; Theory, Method, Application, IISD, International Institute for Sustainable Development, Canada, 124 p.
-Brodhag, C. and Taliere, S., 2006. Sustainable development strategies: Tools for policy coherence, Natural Resources Forum: 30, p. 136-145.
- Castilho, L.C., De Vleeschouwer, K.M., Milner-Gulland, E.J. and Schiavetti, A., 2018. Attitudes and Behaviors of Rural Residents Toward Different Motivations for Hunting and Deforestation in Protected Areas of the Northeastern Atlantic Forest, Brazil. Tropical Conservation Science: 11, p. 1-14.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1940082917753507
- Chen, Y., 2017. Practice of Environmentally Significant Behaviours in Rural China: From Being Motivated by Economic Gains to Being Motivated by Environmental Considerations. behavioral sciences: 7(59), p. 1-16.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5618067/
- Dunlap, R.E. and Van Liere, K.D., 2008. The New Environmental Paradigm, The Journal of Environmental Education: 40(1), p. 19-28.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.3200/JOEE.40.1.19-28
- Geno, B., 2000. Replacing the New Environmental Paradigm(NEP) with an Ecolo gically Sustainable Development Paradigm(ESDP): Testing Scale Items on Rural and Regional Australian Occupational Groups. Sociological Sites/Sights, TASA Conference, Adelaide: Flinders University, p. 36-52.
- Groat, L.N. and Wang, D., 2002. Architectural research methods, New York: John Wiley and Sons, 467 p.
https://www.wiley.com/en-gb/Architectural+Research+Methods,+2nd+Edition-p-9780470908556
- Hilden, M., 1997. Guidelines for Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in the Arctic, Finnish Ministry of the Environment, Finland, 50 p.
- Huddart-Kennedy, E., Beckley, T.M., McFarlane, B.L. and Nadeau, S., 2009. Rural-Urban Differences in Environmental Concern in Canada. Rural Sociology: 74(3), p. 309-329.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1526/003601109789037268
- Kumar Thakur, B., Sekhar Rout, H. and Chakraborty, T., 2014. Environmental Degradation, Sustainable Development and Human Well-being: Evidence from India. Journal of. Commerce and Management: 1(1), p. 101-120.
http://www.i-scholar.in/index.php/MJCMJPI/article/view/59711
- Nordlund, A. and Garvill, J., 2002. Value Structure behind Pro-environmental Behaviors, Journal of Environmental and Behaivior: 34(6), p. 740-756.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/249624481_Value_Structures_Behind_Proenvironmental_Behavior
- Oskamp, S., 2000. Psychological contributions to achieving an ecologicaly sustainable future for humanity. Journal of. Social Issues: 56(3), p. 373-390.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227740320
- Report of the world commission on environment and development: Our common future, 1987. Oxford University Press, 300 p.
https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5987our-common-future.pdf
- UNCCD secretariat, 2013. A Stronger UNCCD for a Land-Degradation Neutral World, IssueBrief, Bonn, Germany, 15 p.
https://catalogue.unccd.int/225_Stronger_UNC
- - Mensah, J., 2019. Sustainable development: Meaning, history, principles, pillars, and implications for human action: Literature review. Cogent Social Sciences: 5(1), p. 1-21.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23311886.2019.1653531
- Yale University, 2018-2020. Iran-Environmental Performance Index. https://epi.yale.edu/ (1399/4/12).