• Register
  • Login
  • Persian

Sustainable Development of Geographical Environment

  1. Home
  2. Evaluating the Level of Sustainability of Arak Urban Areas from the Perspective of Citizens

Current Issue

By Issue

By Author

By Subject

Author Index

Keyword Index

About Journal

Aims and Scope

Editorial Board

Publication Ethics

Indexing and Abstracting

Related Links

FAQ

Peer Review Process

News

Evaluating the Level of Sustainability of Arak Urban Areas from the Perspective of Citizens

    Authors

    • Sedigheh Lotfi
    • Layla Mohammedi Kazem Abadi
    • Mohammad Soleymani

    Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciencec, University of Mazandaran, Iran

,

Document Type : original Article

10.48308/sdge.2023.103830
  • Article Information
  • References
  • Download
  • How to cite
  • Statistics
  • Share

Abstract

Background and purpose
Today, the increasing level of urban population and migration has caused new challenges in the structure and performance of cities in environmental, socio-cultural, and economic issues. Urban sustainability is a concept that emerged as a new paradigm in the world following the sustainable development plan, and it is an approach that leads to social justice. It is necessary to provide a suitable basis for evaluating and measuring environmental, economic, and socio-cultural sustainability in urban planning and development. Arak metropolis is one of the most polluted cities in the country. The purpose of the present study is to measure the sustainability of Arak city zones from the citizens' point of view to show the quality of different city zones.
 
Materials and Methods
The city of Arak, the capital of Markazi Province, has 5 municipal zones and a population of 520,994 in 2016. Regarding geomorphology and geology, Arak is located in a valley surrounded by mountains on three sides and the Miqan desert. With the establishment of several industrial plants, such as machine building and metal industries, in the 1940s, the city became polluted environmentally. The required data and information were collected by secondary and field study using a questionnaire; in order to achieve the objectives of the research, 4 main indicators and 13 sub-indices related to sustainability in Arak were defined from reliable sources in this field and adjusted in the form of a 5-option questionnaire in the form of a Likert scale from very high to very low. The statistical population of the research consists of all the citizens of Arak city who are over 20 years old and have a history of living in Arak city for over 5 years (due to the understanding of the dimensions of the research), which is 384 as sample size. Stratified sampling based on urban neighborhoods were exerted to distribute the questionnaires. In order to measure the validity of the research questionnaire, the opinions of 10 experts commented on the primary version. Also, in order to measure the reliability of the questionnaire, Cronbach's alpha test was exerted, and the reliability coefficient was obtained above 0.70 percent, which confirmed the reliability. Finally, the collected information was analyzed using GIS and SPSS26. To measure indicators for variable, a one-sample t-test and variance test (ANOVA) was used, and Friedman's test was applied to rank indicators and the urban zones. Finally, GIS was applied to display the analysis results in maps regarding the different socio-economic and environmental dimensions.
 
Findings and discussion
The research results showed that the average economic sustainability is more than 3, and the upper and lower limits are positive. So, the status of economic sustainability in the 5 zones of Arak is evaluated from medium to high. Also, the average of the variables of environmental and physical-infrastructural sustainability and socio-cultural sustainability is less than 3, and their lower and upper limits are also negative; Therefore, according to the significance level is less than 0.05, it can be concluded that the average obtained is lower than the value of the test (3) and the status of variables of ecological-environmental sustainability, physical-infrastructural sustainability and socio-cultural sustainability in the  5 zones of Arak are evaluated as less than average and inappropriate. The finding from the Friedman test revealed that the highest average rating (3.14) is assigned to economic and the lowest average rating (2.05) to physical-infrastructural sustainability.
 
Conclusion
The theoretical and research background review showed that sustainability is valued concerning economic, social and environmental indicators. Paying attention to sustainability issues as one of the most important factors and drivers for promoting urban development has been the focus of urban planning researchers and city planners in recent years. Environment-friendly policies could strengthen sustainability. The present research showed that the sustainability of the different urban zones of Ark is evident regarding the different dimensions. So, it can be concluded that the following recommendations could improve the situation as strengthening local and indigenous industries compatible with the environment, increasing green space, concerning the limits of factories can reduce pollutants, and closing polluting industries or at least modifying and improving them.

Keywords

  • Arak
  • Economic sustainability
  • Urban sustainability
  • Industry
  • Environment

Main Subjects

  • Geography and Urban Planning
  • urbanization
  • environment
  • XML
  • PDF 1.3 M
  • RIS
  • EndNote
  • Mendeley
  • BibTeX
  • APA
  • MLA
  • HARVARD
  • CHICAGO
  • VANCOUVER
References
Achmad, A., Hasyim Sirojuzilam, D. and Aulia Dwira, N., 2015. Modeling of urban growth in tsunami-prone city using logistic regression: Analysis of Banda Aceh, Indonesia, Applied geography, 62, 237-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.05.001.
Basiago, A.D., 1998. Economic, social, and environmental sustainability in development theory and urban planning practice. Environmentalist, 19(2), 145-161. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006697118620.
Chen, Y. and Zhang, D., 2020. Evaluation of city sustainability using multi-criteria decision-making considering interaction among criteria in Liaoning province China, Journal of Sustainable Cities and Society, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102211.
Cui, X., Wang, X. and Feng, Y., 2019. Examining urban metabolism: a material flow perspective on cities and their sustainability. J. Clean. Prod., 214, 767-781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.021.
Deep, S. and Saklani, A., 2014. Urban sprawl modeling using cellular automata, The Egyptian journal of remote sensing and space sciences, 17(2), 179-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2014.07.001.
Feleki, E., Vlachokostas, C. and Moussiopoulos, N., 2018. Characterization of sustainability in urban areas: An analysis of assessment tools with emphasis on European cities. Sustainable Cities and Society, 43, 563-577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.08.025.
Foroozesh, F., Monavari, S.M., Salmanmahiny, A., Robati, M. and Rahimi, R., 2021. Assessment of sustainable urban development based on a hybrid decision-making approach: Group fuzzy BWM, AHP, and TOPSIS–GIS, Journal of Sustainable Cities and Society, 6(4), 257-268. DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103402.
Frini, A., Benamor, S. and Urli, B., 2020. Temporal MCDA methods for decision-making in sustainable development context. Sustainability Concept in Developing Countries, http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.90698.
Gonzalez-Garcia, S., Rocío Manteiga, M. and Feijoo, G., 2018. Assessing the Sustainability of Spanish Cities Considering Environmental and Socio-Economic Indicators", Journal of Cleaner Production, 178, 599-610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.056.
Hak, T., Janou skova, S. and Moldan Charles, B., 2015. Sustainable Development Goals: A need for relevant indicators. Ecological Indicators, 60, 565-573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.08.003.
Heikkinen, A., Mäkelä, H., Kujala, J., Nieminen, J., Jokinen, A. and Rekola, H., 2019. Urban ecosystem services and stakeholders: Towards a sustainable capability approach. In Strongly sustainable societies. Chapter 7, 116-132 Taylor & Francis.
Jing, Z. and Wang, J., 2020. Sustainable development evaluation of the society–economy–environment in a resource-based city of China: A complex network approach, Journal of Cleaner Production, 263, 121510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121510.
Li, W. and Yi, P., 2020. Assessment of city sustainability—Coupling coordinated development among economy, society and environment, Journal of Cleaner Production, 256, 120453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120453.
Liu, X., Wang, M., Qiang, W., Wu, K. and Wang, X., 2020. Urban form, shrinking cities, and residential carbon emissions: Evidence from Chinese city-regions. Applied Energy, 261, 114409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114409.
Martínez-Bravo, M., del, M., Martínez-del-Río, J. and Antolín-López, R., 2019. Trade-offs among urban sustainability, pollution and livability in European cities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 224, 651- 660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.110.
National Academies of Science, 2016. Pathways to urban sustainability: challenges and opportunities for the United States. National Academies Press, ISBN: 978-0-309-44453-8, 194 p. DOI: 10.17226/23551
Purvis, B., Mao, Y. and Robinson, D., 2019. Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins, Sustainability science, 14(3), 681-695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5.
Sepahvand, R. and Arefnejad, M., 2013. Prioritization of Sustainable Urban Development Indicators with a Group Analytic Analysis Approach (Case Study: Isfahan City). Journal of Urban Planning, 1(1), 43-59.
Stachura, P. and Kuligowska, K., 2021. Multi-criteria analysis of urban policy for sustainable development decision-making: A case study for Warsaw city, Poland, Journal of Procedia Computer Science, 192, 259-269.
Urli, B., Frini, A. and Amor, S.B., 2019. Promethee-Mp: a generalisation of Promethee for multi-period evaluations under uncertainty, International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making, 8(1), 13-37.
Wątróbski, J., Bączkiewicz, A., Ziemba, E. and Sałabun, W., 2022. Sustainable cities and communities’ assessment using the DARIA-TOPSIS method, Sustainable Cities and Society, 83, 103926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.103926.
Zhao, L., Zha, Y., Zhuang, Y. and Liang, L., 2019. Data envelopment analysis for sustainability evaluation in China: Tackling the economic, environmental, and social dimensions, European Journal of Operational Research, 275(3), 1083-1095, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.103926.
    • Article View: 495
    • PDF Download: 610
Sustainable Development of Geographical Environment
Volume 5, Issue 8
August 2023
Pages 1-17
Files
  • XML
  • PDF 1.3 M
Share
How to cite
  • RIS
  • EndNote
  • Mendeley
  • BibTeX
  • APA
  • MLA
  • HARVARD
  • CHICAGO
  • VANCOUVER
Statistics
  • Article View: 495
  • PDF Download: 610

APA

Lotfi, S. , Mohammedi Kazem Abadi, L. and Soleymani, M. (2023). Evaluating the Level of Sustainability of Arak Urban Areas from the Perspective of Citizens. Sustainable Development of Geographical Environment, 5(8), 1-17. doi: 10.48308/sdge.2023.103830

MLA

Lotfi, S. , , Mohammedi Kazem Abadi, L. , and Soleymani, M. . "Evaluating the Level of Sustainability of Arak Urban Areas from the Perspective of Citizens", Sustainable Development of Geographical Environment, 5, 8, 2023, 1-17. doi: 10.48308/sdge.2023.103830

HARVARD

Lotfi, S., Mohammedi Kazem Abadi, L., Soleymani, M. (2023). 'Evaluating the Level of Sustainability of Arak Urban Areas from the Perspective of Citizens', Sustainable Development of Geographical Environment, 5(8), pp. 1-17. doi: 10.48308/sdge.2023.103830

CHICAGO

S. Lotfi , L. Mohammedi Kazem Abadi and M. Soleymani, "Evaluating the Level of Sustainability of Arak Urban Areas from the Perspective of Citizens," Sustainable Development of Geographical Environment, 5 8 (2023): 1-17, doi: 10.48308/sdge.2023.103830

VANCOUVER

Lotfi, S., Mohammedi Kazem Abadi, L., Soleymani, M. Evaluating the Level of Sustainability of Arak Urban Areas from the Perspective of Citizens. Sustainable Development of Geographical Environment, 2023; 5(8): 1-17. doi: 10.48308/sdge.2023.103830

  • Home
  • About Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
  • Sitemap

News

  • Certificate 2023-02-21

Newsletter Subscription

Subscribe to the journal newsletter and receive the latest news and updates

© Journal management system. designed by sinaweb