Abstract
Therefore, the aim of the present research is to analyze the content/procedural inefficiency of the policymaking of the Supreme Council of Urban Planning and Architecture of Iran from the point of view of the right to the city in urban and citizenship laws. The method used in this research is qualitative content analysis. Based on the literature and theoretical foundations of the subject, the analytical framework of the research was determined and the resulting variables, dimensions, components, and categories were presented and then, using the same framework, the desired laws were determined by sampling from known cases. were selected and analyzed. For this purpose, 8 selected laws were scored in 13 components of the analytical framework. The reliability of the analysis was 0.895. The results showed that the rules in the procedural component with a score of 3.85 were more favorable than the content component with a score of 3.11, so the vulnerability of policies was more than the content aspect. Also, among the eight reviewed laws, the country's constitution ranked first in terms of content and procedural quality, and the law respecting legitimate freedoms ranked eighth in terms of content and procedural quality. Therefore, mere technical decisions or planning and ordering plans cannot be considered as legislation in urban planning and architecture. Therefore, until the legal system and the urban planning system do not specify their task with the issue and issues of urban planning, the compiled policies cannot solve the problems of urban planning and architecture.
Main Subjects
)