A Interpretive Study of the Physical Transformation of Contemporary Public Spaces and Its Impact on the Quality of Social Interactions in Selected Areas of Tehran

Document Type : Original article

Authors

1 Department of Urban Planning,Ara.C., Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran.

2 Department of Architecture & Urban Planning, Ta.C., Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran

3 Department of Architecture & Urban Planning, Ilk.C., Islamic Azad University, Ilkhchi, Iran.

Abstract

Introduction: Public spaces, as the main platform for the formation of urban life, play a decisive role in the quality of citizens' interactions and social bonds. In recent decades, physical transformations resulting from modern planning and rapid urban development, often without considering socio-cultural dimensions, have led to a fundamental change in the essence of these spaces. These changes have affected their potential to strengthen social interactions, sense of place attachment, and social capital. In recent decades, a devastating paradox has occurred in the urban development of Tehran (and many metropolises around the world): on one hand, the symbolic and economic importance of public space is increasingly emphasized, and on the other hand, its social and cultural nature is being destroyed in the gears of modern urban planning and speculative urbanism. Prioritizing traffic efficiency at the expense of destroying sidewalks and gathering spaces, giving priority to symbols of development. at the cost of ignoring the human scale, and turning multi-purpose spaces into uniform, controlled commercial products are just a few examples of this trend. These transformations, which often lack historical sensitivity and are indifferent to local wisdom, gradually erase collective memory from spaces, turning them into rootless, defenseless, and passive places. This research was conducted with the aim of studying the physical transformation of public spaces and its impact on the quality of social interactions in selected areas of Tehran.
Materials and Methods: The present study is applied in terms of purpose and qualitative in terms of method. The statistical population of the qualitative section includes experts and specialists in fields related to urban collective spaces (such as urban planning, architecture, urban design, urban sociology, and urban management). A purposive snowball sampling method was employed for participant selection, whereby initially a number of recognized experts were identified and interviewed, and then, through their referrals, other qualified individuals were added to the sample. Data collection continued based on the principle of theoretical saturation; after conducting 10 interviews, no new data emerged, and theoretical saturation was achieved. Consequently, the interview process was halted at this stage. The collected data were then analyzed using MAXQDA qualitative data analysis software.
Results and Discussion: Analysis of the findings indicates that a total of 474 conceptual codes were extracted from the interview data through coding. These codes were organized during the analysis process into 6 main categories and 18 subcategories. Based on frequency and importance, the most significant main categories identified, in order, are: factors affecting transformation (24.7%), physical-spatial transformations (22.8%), and strategies and solutions (18.6%) of the total extracted codes. To ensure the reliability of the coding process, Cohen's Kappa coefficient was calculated, yielding a value of 0.81. This value indicates a high level of agreement among coders and suitable reliability of the qualitative data. Furthermore, using network analysis, key nodes influencing the studied system were identified. The results showed that political-managerial factors, with 31 references and 5 connections, act as the central and pivotal node. On the other hand, transformations during the Pahlavi period, with 42 references, were identified as the most significant historical key node, having the greatest impact on shaping the current situation. Regarding solutions, out of 17 identified strategies, the analysis results determined that 9 strategies fall into the very high priority group. These strategies primarily focus on categories such as community-based regeneration, revitalizing human scale, enhancing walkability, and increasing citizen participation, and should be placed at the forefront of future actions.
Conclusion: The results of the research indicate that public spaces are not neutral backgrounds, but rather play a decisive and dynamic role in the quality and quantity of communications and social bonds among citizens in the selected areas of Tehran. Public spaces should be recognized as living and dynamic arenas that enable diverse interactions, dialogue among different groups, and the formation of a collective identity, which requires a fundamental review and redesign with this approach

Keywords

Main Subjects


Abarghouei Fard,H. , Motalebi,G. and Mansouri,S. A. (2023). A theory of Good Form of Public Space» A Critical Review of the Criteria for the Formation of Efficient Public Space. The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar, 20(121), 37-54. (In Persian)
Bernabeu-Bautista, Á., Serrano-Estrada, L., & Marti, P. (2023). The role of successful public spaces in historic centres. Insights from social media data. Cities, 137, 104337.
Bernabeu-Bautista, Alvaro. Serrano-Estrada, Leticia. Marti, Oablo. (2023). the role of successful public spaces in historic centres. Insights from social media data. Cities, (137), 104337, www.elsevier.com/locate/cities.
Carmona, M., De Magalhães, C., & Hammond, L. (2008). Public space: the management dimension. Routledge.‏
Carmona, M., Heath, T., Oc, T., & Tiesdell, S. (2009). Public places, urban spaces: The dimensions of urban design (F. Gharai, M. Shokouhi, Z. Ahari, & E. Salehi, Trans.). Payam-e. (Original work published 2003).
Carmona, M., Tiesdell, S., Heath, T., & Oc, T. (2021). The perceptual dimension. Public Places, Urban Spaces: The Dimensions of Urban Design, 111-132.‏
dabiri,H. & zare,L. (2021). Investigating the Effect of Effective Security Components on Public Spaces to Attract Citizens Case Study: Student Park of Tehran. Geography (Regional Planning), 11(42), 741-753. (In Persian)
Dadgar, F., & Ghasri, M. A. (2022). The role of RasulÄ« market as a socio-commercial space in improving the quality of the urban environment of Zahedan. Geographical Research, 37(2), 267–276. (In Persian)
Durkheim, E. (1893). De la division du travail social (The Division of Labour in Society).
https://monoskop.org/images/9/97/Durkheim_%C3%89mile_De_la_division_du_travail_social_1991.
Gehl, J. (2011). Life between buildings: Using public space. Island Press
https://cus.ubt-uni.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Jan-Gehl-Life-Between-Buildings_-Using-Public-Space-2011-Island-Press.
gholikiani,P. , Sohrabi,V. and hoseiny,O. (2024). Evaluation of the effective index on the incidence of collective life in public spaces (study sample: Keshavarz Boulevard, Tehran). Geographical Engineering of Territory7(4), 913-922. (In Persian)
doi: 10.22034/jget.2023.275565.1261
Habermas, J. (1981). Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns [Theory of communicative action]. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
https://soztheo.de/soziologie/schluesselwerke-der-soziologie/juergen-habermas-theorie-des-kommunikativen-handelns-1981/
Lorenzo, M. Ríos-Rodríguez, M. L. Sua´rez, E. Herna´ndez, B. Rosales, C. (2023). Quality analysis and categorisation of public space. Heliyon, (9), e13861, https://www.cell.com/heliyon/fulltext/S2405-8440(23)01068-X?uuid=uuid%3A144a68c7-4b16-4562-8874-4fac039a0742
Low, S. M. (2023). Why public space matters. Oxford University Press.‏
Low, S. M. Taplin, D. Scheld, S. (2009). Rethinking urban parks: Public space and cultura diversity. Texas: University of Texas Press.
Madanipour, A. (2003). Public and private spaces of the city. Routledge. (In Persian)
Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1848). Manifest der Kommunistichen Partei [The Communist Manifesto]. London. Milenkovitch, DD (1971). Plan and market in Yugoslav economic thought. New Haven: Yale University.
https://www.kpoe-steiermark.at/dl/5408cec1d17ee4f9adff37c4c31f3790/manifest.
Mehta, V. (2013). The Street: A Quintessential Public Space. Routledge
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203067635
Mehta, V. (2022). Public Space: notes on why it matters, what we should know, and how to realize its potential. Routledge.‏
Moghtader,B. , Etesam,I. and Matin,M. (2020). Developing a Framework for Promoting Social Interactions in the Architecture of Industrial Towns in Rural Areas of Tehran. Islamic Art Studies, 16.17(39), 440-450. doi: 10.22034/ias.2020.211833.1111
Mohammadzade Balalami, S. , Ghasemi, M. , Norouzi, M. and Nikpour, M. (2023). Assessing the Sociopetality of urban public spaces with an emphasis on the factor of enclosure ( Case study : Bam Central Square ). Journal of Sustainable Architecture and Urban Design11(1), 159-176. (In Persian)
Ddi: 10.22061/jsaud.2023.9199.2071
Noghsanmohammadi, M. , Rajabi Ghotromi, M. and Montazerolhodjah, M. (2024). The Urban Architecture andSpatial Model of Taft Town Hosseiniyahs as Examples of Collective Iranian-Islamic Space; A Study Based on Analytical Approach and the Graph Theory. Soffeh, 34(2), 41-67. (In Persian)
Oliveira, V. (2016). Urban morphology: An introduction to the study of the physical form of cities. Springer.Doi:10.1007/978-3-319-32083-0
Pakzad, J. (2007). Mabani-ye nazari va farayand-e tarrahi-ye shahri [The theoretical foundations and process of urban design]. Shahidi Publications. (In Persian)
https://www.gisoom.com/book/1377639/%DA%A9%D8%AA%D8%A7%D8%A8-%D9%85%D8%A8%D8%A7%D9%86%DB%8C-%D9%86%D8%B8%D8%B1%DB%8C-%D9%88-%D9%81%D8%B1%D8%A7%DB%8C%D9%86%D8%AF-%D8%B7%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%AD%DB%8C-%D8%B4%D9%87%D8%B1%DB%8C/
Pierre, B. (1979). La distinction. Critique sociale du jugement.
https://psychaanalyse.com/pdf/LA_DISTINCTION_CRITIQUE_SOCIALE_DU_JUGEMENT.
Pourbahador, P., & Brinkhuijsen, M. (2023). Municipal strategies for protecting the sense of place through public space management in historic cities: A case study of Amsterdam. Cities, 136, 104242.‏
Qi, J., Mazumdar, S., & Vasconcelos, A. C. (2024). Understanding the relationship between urban public space and social cohesion: A systematic review. International Journal of Community Well-Being, 7(2), 155-212.‏
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42413-024-00204-5
shaterian, M. & Karimi, R. (2022). Modeling Physical Factors and Their Effects on Social Interactions (Case Study: Old Texture of Kashan). Physical Social Planning, 9(3), 33-48. (In Persian)
doi: 10.30473/psp.2023.47396.2149.
Tayyebi,A. (2022). The impact of the tangible - artifact dimension of urban public open space on the mental image of tourists from that space: a qualitative study. Geography (Regional Planning), 12(47), 763-783. (In Persian). doi: 10.22034/jgeoq.2022.310505.3365
Turgut, Yakup. Lazarova-Molnar, Sanja. (2025). exploring urban segregation dynamics: A hub-based agent model integrating preferences, social interactions, and policy interventions. Cities, (156), 105576, www.elsevier.com/locate/cities.
Wang, D., & Li, S. (2025). Social conflicts and their resolution paths in the commercialized renewal of old urban communities in China under the perspective of public value. Journal of Urban Management, 14(2), 402-417.
Zhu, Yihan. Zhang, Ye. Biljecki, Filip. (2025). Understanding the user perspective on urban public spaces: A systematic        review and opportunities for machine learning. Cities, 156, 105535, www.elsevier.com/locate/cities.