ژویی سانس و اربابْ دال هایِ برنامه ریزی: چارچوب نوین تحلیل عرصه نمادین برنامه ریزی

Allmendinger, P., 2001. Planning in postmodern times. Psychology Press, 280 p.
-Allmendinger, P., 2002. Towards a post-positivist typology of planning theory, Planning theory: 1(1), p. 77-99.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/147309520200100105
-Allmendinger, P. and Gunder, M., 2005. Applying Lacanian insight and a dash of Derridean deconstruction to planning’s ‘dark side’. Planning theory: 4(1), p. 87-112.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1473095205051444
-Bracher, M., Alcorn, M.W., Corthell, R. and Massardier-Kenney, F., 1994. Lacanian theory of discourse: Subject, structure, and society. NYU Press,176 p.
-Bunce, S., 2004. The emergence of ‘smart growth’intensification in Toronto: environment and economy in the new official plan, Local Environment: 9(2), p. 177-191.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1354983042000199525
-Butler, J., 1997. The psychic life of power: Theories in subjection. Stanford University Press, 228 p.
-Butler, J., Laclau, E., Žižek, S. and Zizek, S., 2000. Contingency, hegemony, universality: Contemporary dialogues on the left, Verso., 330 p.
-Dean, T., 1997. Two kinds of other and their consequences, Critical Inquiry: 23(4), p. 910-920.
https://experts.illinois.edu/en/publications/two-kinds-of-other-and-their-consequences
-Eeten, M.V. and Roe, E., 2000 .When fiction conveys truth and authority: The Netherlands Green Heart planning controversy, Journal of the American Planning Association: 66(1), p. 58-67.
-Ewing, R., 1997. Is Los Angeles-style sprawl desirable? Journal of the American Planning Association: 63(1), p. 107-126. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01944369708975728
-Fink, B., 2002. Knowledge and jouissance. Reading Seminar XX: Lacan’s major work on love, knowledge, and feminine sexuality, 258 p.
-Flyvbjerg, B., 1998. Rationality and power: Democracy in practice. University of Chicago press, 308 p.
-Gow, L., 2000. Curbing the Sprawl: Urban Growth Management in the United States--lessons for New Zealand, Ministry for the Environment, 120 p.
-Gunder, M., 2003. Planning policy formulation from a Lacanian perspective, International planning studies: 8(4), p. 279-294.
-Gunder, M. and Hillier, J., 2007. Planning as urban therapeutic. Environment and Planning A, 39(2), 467-486.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1068/a38236
-Gunder, M. and Hillier, J., 2009. Planning in ten words or less: A Lacanian entanglement with spatial planning, Ashgate Publishing, Ltd,
256 p.
-Hillier, J., 2003. Agon'izing over consensus: Why habermasian ideals cannot beReal'. Planning theory, 2(1), p. 37-59.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1473095203002001005
-Hillier, J., 2005. Straddling the post-structuralist abyss: between transcendence and immanence? Planning theory: 4(3), p. 271-299.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/249742413_Straddling_the_Post-Structuralist_Abyss_Between_Transcendence_and_Immanence
-Hook, D., 2008. Absolute Other: Lacan's ‘Big Other’as Adjunct to Critical Social Psychological Analysis? Social and Personality Psychology Compass: 2(1), p. 51-73.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00067.x
-Hutcheon, L., 2012. A theory of adaptation. Routledge, 304 p.
-Keil, R. and Boudreau, J.A., 2005. Is there regionalism after municipal amalgamation in Toronto? City: 9(1), p. 9-22.
https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cityxx/v9y2005i1p9-22.html
-Kipfer, S. and Keil, R., 2002. Toronto Inc? Planning the competitive city in the new Toronto, Antipode: 34(2), p. 227-264.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1467-8330.00237
-Lacan, J., 2013. The ethics of psychoanalysis 1959-1960: The seminar of Jacques Lacan. Routledge, 352 p.
-Laclau, E., 1989. Preference. In The sublime object of ideology, by S. Zizek, ix-xv. London: Verso, 320 p.
-Purcell, M., 2009. Resisting neoliberalization: communicative planning or counter-hegemonic movements? Planning theory: 8(2), p.140-165.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1473095209102232
-Ragland, E., 1996. The discourse of the master. Lacan, politics, aesthetics,Sunny press, 341 p.
-Sandercock, L., 2004. Towards a planning imagination for the 21st century. Journal of the American Planning Association: 70(2), p.133-141.
-Stavrakakis, Y., 2007. Lacanian Left. Edinburgh University Press.
-Tregoning, H., Agyeman, J. and Shenot, C., 2002. Sprawl, smart growth and sustainability. Local Environment: 7(4), p. 341-347.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1354983022000027464
-Verhaeghe, P., 2001. Beyond gender. New York: Other Press, 168 p.
-Wesley Scott, J., 2007. Smart growth as urban reform: A pragmatic'recoding'of the new regionalism. Urban studies: 44(1), p.15-35.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/248974176_Smart_Growth_as_Urban_Reform_A_Pragmatic_'Recoding'_of_the_New_Regionalism
-Žižek, S., 1998. Four discourses, four subjects. Cogito and the Unconscious, Duke University Press, 288 p.
-Žižek, S., 1999. Fantasy as a Political Category: A Lacanian Approach’, in Wright, E., Wright, E. (eds) The Žižek Reader, 89-101 (Oxford, Blackwell). Wright, E., Wright, E. (eds) The Žižek Reader, 89-101 (Oxford, Blackwell), 346 p.
-Žižek, S., 2002. For they know not what they do: Enjoyment as a political factor. Verso,
288 p.
-Žižek, S., 2005. Interrogating the real.(Eds ,).R. Butler & S. Stephens. New York & London: Continuum, 392 p.